| |

This page is currently,
and probabaly will always be, under construction. The ideas and
technologies in argon dating are ever changing, occasionally surmounting
problems posed
in the following discussion. It is a goal of this page to build a
list of reference material
available to anyone interested in a more comprehensive understanding
of argon geochronology.
A good start would be the book "Geochronology and Thermochronology
by the 40Ar/39Ar Method"
by McDougall and Harrison (1999).
|
The
Potassium-Argon System
I. Overview
A. Isotopes of Potassium and
Argon
B. Radioactive decay of
parent isotope to daughter isotope
II. The K/Ar Dating technique
A.
General Assumptions for the Potassium-Argon dating
system
B. K/Ar age determination
C. Problems and limitations of
the K/Ar technique
III. The 40Ar/39Ar
Dating technique
A. Principles
of the 40Ar/39Ar method
B. Irradiation/Production of 39Ar
C. 40Ar/39Ar
age determination
D. Some issues with the 40Ar/39Ar
technique
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
I. Overview
A.
Isotopes of Potassium and Argon
The isotopes the KAr system relies on are Potassium (K)
and Argon (Ar). Potassium, an alkali metal, the Earth's
eighth most abundant element is common in many rocks and
rock-forming minerals. The quantity of potassium in a
rock or mineral is variable proportional to the amount
of silica present. Therefore, mafic rocks or minerals
often contain less potassium than an equal amount of silicic
rock or mineral. Potassium can be mobilized into or out
of a rock or mineral through alteration processes. Due
to the relatively heavy atomic weight of potassium, insignificant
fractionation of the different potassium isotopes occurs.
However, the 40K isotope is radioactive and
therefore will be reduced in quantity over time. But,
for the purposes of the KAr dating system, the relative
abundance of 40K is so small and its half-life
is so long that its ratios with the other Potassium isotopes
are considered constant.
Natural Abundances of Potassium
and Argon Isotopes:

Argon, a noble gas, constitutes approximately 0.1-5%
of the Earth's present day atmosphere. Because it is present
within the atmosphere, every rock and mineral will have
some quantity of Argon. Argon can mobilized into or out
of a rock or mineral through alteration and thermal
processes. Like Potassium, Argon cannot be significantly
fractionated in nature. However, 40Ar is the
decay product of 40K and therefore will increase
in quantity over time. The quantity of 40Ar
produced in a rock or mineral over time can be determined
by substracting the amount known to be contained in the
atmosphere. This is done using the constant 40Ar/36Ar
ratio of atmospheric Argon. This ratio is 295.5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Radioactive decay of parent isotope to daughter isotope
The nuclei of naturally occurring 40K is unstable,
decaying at a constant rate (half-life = 1.25 billion
years). The decay scheme is electron capture and positron
decay. About 89% of the 40K atoms will decay
to 40Ca. For the K/Ar dating system, this decay
scheme to calcium isotopes is ignored. The remaining 11%
of the 40K atoms decay to 40Ar.
It is this scheme that makes the K/Ar method work.
The buildup of radiogenic 40Ar (40Ar*)
in a closed system can be expressed by the equation:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. The K/Ar Dating technique
A.
General assumptions for the Potassium-Argon dating system
Certain assumptions must be satisfied before the age
of mineral can be calculated with the Potassium-Argon
dating technique. These are:
+ The material in question must be a closed system.
In other words, no radiogenic 40Ar has escaped
from the rock/mineral since it formed. In the case of
a volcanic mineral, these means rapid cooling.
+ A correction must be made for atmospheric 40Ar
(40Ar from the 40Ar/36Ar
ratio = 295.5 subtracted).
+ No non-atmospheric 40Ar was incorporated
into the rock/mineral during or after its formation.
+ The rock/mineral must be a closed system with respect
to potassium.
+ The isotopes of Potassium in the rock/mineral have
not been fractionated, except by 40K decay
+ The decay constants of 40K are accurately
known.
+ The quantities of 40Ar and potassium in
the rock/mineral are accurately determined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
The K/Ar age determination
Once the 40Ar and potassium
in a rock/mineral are accurately measured, the amount
of 40K (based on the relative abundance of
40K to total potassium) and 40Ar*
(radiogenic 40Ar) must be calculated. The
K/Ar method uses a spike of 38Ar mixed with
the argon extracted from the rock/mineral to determine
the 40Ar*. The resulting 40Ar*
and 40K can be plugged into the age equation
as follows:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Problems and Limitations of the K/Ar dating technique
Because the K/Ar dating technique relies on the determining
the absolute abundances of both 40Ar and
potassium, there is not a reliable way to determine
if the assumptions are
valid. Argon loss and excess argon are two common
problems that may cause erroneous ages to be determined.
Argon loss occurs when radiogenic 40Ar
(40Ar*) produced within a rock/mineral
escapes sometime after its formation. Alteration and
high temperature can damage a rock/mineral lattice
sufficiently to allow 40Ar* to be released.
This can cause the calculated K/Ar age to be younger
than the "true" age of the dated material.
Conversely, excess argon (40ArE)
can cause the calculated K/Ar age to be older than
the "true" age of the dated material. Excess
argon is simply 40Ar that is attributed
to radiogenic 40Ar and/or atmospheric 40Ar.
Excess argon may be derived from the mantle, as bubbles
trapped in a melt, in the case of a magma. Or it could
be a xenocryst/xenolith trapped in a magma/lava during
emplacement.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
A.
Principles of the 40Ar/39Ar
method
The 40Ar/39Ar dating technique
is a more sophisticated variation of the K/Ar dating
technique. Both techniques rely on the measurement
of a daughter isotope (40Ar) and a parent
isotope. While the K/Ar technique measures potassium
as the parent, the 40Ar/39Ar
technique uses 39Ar.
Because the relative abundances
of the potassium isotopes are known, the 39ArK
(produced from 39K by a fast neutron reaction)
can be used as a proxy for potassium. Therefore, unlike
the conventional K/Ar technique, absolute abundances
need not be measured. Instead, the ratios of the different
argon isotopes are measured, yielding more precise
and accurate results. Additional advantages of the
single isotopic measurements of the 40Ar/39Ar
technique are decreased effects of sample inhomogeneity
and the use of smaller sample sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Sample Irradiation / Production of 39Ar
Because 39ArK can only be produced
by a fast nuetron reaction on 39K [ 39K(n,p)39Ar
], all samples dated by the 40Ar/39Ar
technique must be irradiated in the core of a nuclear
reactor. The amount of 39ArK
produced in any given irradiation will be dependant
on the amount of 39K present initially,
the length of the irradiation, the neutron flux density
and the neutron capture cross section for 39K.
However, because each of these parameters is difficult
to determine independantly, a mineral standard, or
monitor, of known age is irradiated with the samples
of unknown age. The monitor flux can then be extrapolated
to the samples, thereby determining their flux. This
flux is known as the 'J' and can be determined by
the following equation:
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
In addition to 39Ar production from 39K,
several other 'interference' reactions occur during irradiation
of the samples. Other isotopes of argon are produced from
potassium, calcium, argon and chlorine. These are:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
As the table above illustrates, several "undesirable"
reactions occur on isotopes present within every geologic
sample. These reactor produced isotopes of argon must
be corrected for in order to determine an accurate age.
The monitoring of the interfering reactions is performed
through the use of laboratory salts and glasses. For example,
to determine the amount of reactor produced 40Ar
from 40K, potassium-rich glass is irradiated
with the samples. The 40Ar/39Ar
ratio of the glass is then measured in the mass spectrometer
to determine the correction factor that must be applied
to the rest of the samples in that irradiation. CaF is
also routinely irradiated and measured to determine the
36Ar/37Ar and 39Ar/37Ar
correction factors. The "desirable" production
of 37Ar from 40Ca allows us determine
how much 36Ar and 39Ar to correct
for, as well as the K/Ca ratio of the sample. The desirable
production of 38Ar from 37Cl allows us to determine
how much chlorine is present in our samples. A salt of
KCl is irradiated to determine the 38Ar/39Ar
production ratio which can then be applied to other samples
to determine K/Cl ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
40Ar/39Ar age determination
Once the J (neutron flux parameter), 40Ar*
and 39ArK have been determined (ie.
subtracting atmospheric argon, system blank and interferring
reactor produced isotopes), they can be included in the
40Ar/39Ar age equation:
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the 40Ar/39Ar technique
relies on ratios instead of absolute quantities, we are
able to extract
and measure multiple aliquots of argon from a single sample.
Multiple argon extractions can be performed on a sample
in several ways. Step-heating is the most common way and
involves either a furnace
or a laser to uniformily
heat the sample to evolve argon. The individual ages from
each heating step are then graphically plotted on an age
spectrum or an isochron.
Mechanical crushing
is also a technique capable of releasing argon from a
single sample in multiple steps.
Laser probes also
allow multiple ages to be determined on a single sample
aliquot, but do so using accurate and precise spatial
control. For example, laser spot sizes of 100 microns
or less allow a user to extract multiple argon samples
from across a small mica or feldspar grain. The results
from a laser probe can be plotted in several graphical
ways, including a map of a grain showing lateral argon
distribution.
40Ar/39Ar total fusion of a sample
is comparable to a K/Ar age determination in that it relies
on wholesale release of argon at one time. However, unlike
conventional K/Ar, 40Ar/39Ar total
fusion measures ratios, making it ideal for samples known
to be very argon retentive (eg. sanidine). Total fusion
is performed using a laser
and results are commonly plotted on probability
distribution diagrams or ideograms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Some problems with the 40Ar/39Ar
technique.
Standard Intercalibration - In order for an age
to be calculated by the 40Ar/39Ar
technique, the J parameter must be known. For the J to
be determined, a standard of known age must be irradiated
with the samples of unknown age. Because this (primary)
standard ultimately cannot be determined by 40Ar/39Ar,
it must be first determined by another isotopic dating
method. The method most commonly used to date the primary
standard is the conventional K/Ar technique. The primary
standard must be a mineral that is homogeneous, abundant
and easily dated by the K/Ar and 40Ar/39Ar
methods. Traditionally, this primary standard has been
a hornblende from the McClure Mountains, Colorado (a.k.a.
MMhb-1). Once an accurate and precise age is determined
for the primary standard, other minerals can be dated
relative to it by the 40Ar/39Ar
method. These secondary minerals are often more convenient
to date by the 40Ar/39Ar technique
(e.g. sanidine). However, while it is often easy to determine
the age of the primary standard by the K/Ar method, it
is difficult for different dating laboratories to agree
on the final age. Likewise, because of heterogeneity problems
with the MMhb-1 sample, the K/Ar ages are not always reproducible.
This imprecision (and inaccuracy) is transferred to the
secondary minerals used daily by the 40Ar/39Ar
technique. Fortunately, other techniques are available
to re-evaluate and test the absolute ages of the standards
used by the 40Ar/39Ar technique.
Some of these include other isotopic dating techniques
(e.g. U/Pb) and the astronomical polarity time scale (APTS).
Decay Constants - Another issue affecting the
ultimate precision and accuracy of the 40Ar/39Ar
technique is the uncertainty in the decay constants for
40K. This uncertainty results from 1) the branched
decay scheme of 40K and 2) the long half-life
of 40K (1.25 billion years). As technology
advances, it is likely that the decay constants used in
the 40Ar/39Ar age equation will
become continually more refined allowing much more accurate
and precise ages to be determined.
J Factor - Because the J value is extrapolated
from a standard to an unknown, the accuracy and precision
on that J value is critical. J value uncertainty can be
minimized by constraining the geometry of the standard
relative to the unknown, both vertically and horizontally.
The NMGRL does this by irradiating samples in machined
aluminum disks where standards and unknowns alternate
every other position. J error can also be reduced by analyzing
more flux monitor aliquots per standard location.
39Ar Recoil - The affects of irradiation
on potassium-bearing rocks/minerals can sometimes result
in anomalously old apparent ages. This is caused by the
net loss of 39ArK from the sample
by recoil (the kinetic energy imparted on a 39ArK
atom by the emission of a proton during the (n,p) reaction).
Recoil is likely in every potassium-bearing sample, but
only becomes a significant problem with very fine grained
minerals (e.g. clays) and glass. For multi-phase samples
such as basaltic wholerocks, 39ArK
redistribution may be more of a problem than net 39ArK
loss. In this case, 39Ar may recoil out of
a low-temperature, high-potassium mineral (e.g. K-feldspar)
into a high-temperature, low potassium mineral (e.g. pyroxene).
Such a phenomenon would great affect the shape of the
age spectrum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|